If you use H-2A you’re going to want to pay attention to this one. On August 26, a federal judge in the Eastern District of California ruled that the Department of Labor’s H-2A wage methodology — the Interim Final Rule DOL rushed out last October — is unlawful. This is the rule that replaced the old Farm Labor Survey with the OEWS, created the two-tier skill system, and introduced that “housing adjustment” that knocked money off the AEWR to account for free housing.
Here’s the bottom line for now: the current AEWRs stay in effect. The judge didn’t vacate the rule outright — she said pulling it immediately would be too disruptive since AEWRs are the wage floor for the whole program. Instead, she sent it back to DOL and ordered them to come up with a new, lawful methodology. So nothing changes on your payroll today.
What did the court actually find wrong with it? A few things:
- The tier system. DOL split H-2A jobs into two skill levels, but the math didn’t hold up. 92% of H-2A workers landed in the bottom tier, and DOL set that tier’s wage at the 17th percentile — well below market. The court said DOL borrowed that number from the H-1B visa program without explaining why it made sense for a completely different tier structure.
- The housing adjustment. DOL deducted the value of free housing from the AEWR, but employers are still legally required to provide that housing for free. The court called this a direct conflict — you can’t require free housing and then dock the wage to pay for it. It also pointed out the math assumed a 40-hour week, so anyone working more than that would effectively overpay for their own housing.
- Using OEWS data at all. With the Farm Labor Survey discontinued, DOL had to pick something else — the court didn’t fault them for that. But it faulted them for leaning on OEWS data from farm labor contractors, which DOL itself has previously said pays lower wages and isn’t representative of the broader farmworker population, without adjusting for that gap.
- The “greater than 50%” rule. If a worker’s duties span two job classifications, this rule says the whole job gets classified — and paid — at whichever classification the worker spends more than half their time on. The court said this could push employers to shuffle higher-paying duties around so no one technically “primarily” does that work, and DOL never grappled with that risk.
The one thing DOL got right, procedurally, was moving fast to pick a new data source once the Farm Labor Survey went away — the court agreed that was an emergency. But rolling the tier system, housing adjustment, and 50% rule into that same emergency rulemaking, without going through public notice and comment, is where DOL lost.
BACK PAY…. The court ordered DOL to notify employers within 7 days that if you use H-2A labor between now and whenever DOL issues a new, lawful AEWR methodology, you could be on the hook for wage adjustment payments — the difference between what you paid and what the new AEWR turns out to be, retroactive to that window. DOL also has to report back to the court in two weeks with a timeline for the new methodology.
I know a bunch of gins are using H-2A and either have gotten some of their labor or will soon. So…there’s real exposure here if the new AEWRs come in higher than what’s on the books now. We don’t know that timeline yet, and we don’t know what the new methodology will look like. And we don’t know how contracts that are on the books will need to handle whatever comes out. We’ll keep you posted as DOL responds and as the backpay question gets sorted out in court.
If you have questions about how this affects your current H-2A contracts, give us a call.
DSF

